May 8, 2012
May 7, 2012
May 7, 2012
Apr 19, 2012
Apr 4, 2012
Mar 30, 2012
Mar 9, 2012
Mar 5, 2012
Feb 27, 2012
Feb 27, 2012
Feb 24, 2012
Feb 1, 2012
Jan 17, 2012
Dec 29, 2011
Dec 13, 2011
Dec 9, 2011
Dec 7, 2011
Dec 7, 2011
Dec 2, 2011
Nov 30, 2011
Nov 22, 2011
Nov 22, 2011
Nov 18, 2011
Nov 16, 2011
Oct 31, 2011
Oct 28, 2011
Oct 20, 2011
Oct 19, 2011
Sep 8, 2011
Aug 16, 2011
Jul 11, 2011
Jun 24, 2011
Jun 22, 2011
Jun 20, 2011
Jun 16, 2011
May 30, 2011
May 6, 2011
Apr 27, 2011
Apr 26, 2011
Apr 7, 2011
Mar 26, 2011
Mar 25, 2011
Mar 22, 2011
Mar 11, 2011
Researchers asked a panel of 307 people about how risky they believe nanoparticles are compared to 23 other public health risks – such as obesity, smoking, using cell phones and nuclear energy. The results of this new study find that the general public thinks getting a suntan poses a greater public health risk than nanotechnology or other nanoparticle applications. In fact, 60 percent of respondents felt that nanoparticles posed either no health risk or only a slight health risk. The study, from North Carolina State University, is the first to compare the public’s perception of the risks associated with nanoparticles to other environmental and health safety risks. The resulting paper, “Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks,” is forthcoming from the Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
